System of assessment of pupils at the university

System of assessment of pupils at the university

In many degree institutions all over the world, they normally use a four-point system for assessing students’ knowledge, skills and abilities: “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”.

Knowing the meaning of points

The assessment “excellent” deserves a student who has got discovered comprehensive, systematic and knowledge that is deep the capability to independently perform the tasks supplied by this system, knowledgeable about the primary and extra literary works, recommended by this program. Such an evaluation also requires the mastering regarding the relationship amongst the fundamental principles of control and their significance when it comes to obtained profession.

The evaluation “good” sets the pupil that has mastered the academic and system material in full,successfully fulfills this program’s tasks, worked out the literature that is main by this program. That is, a student who has got shown the systematic nature of discipline knowledge and is with the capacity of self-replenishment and upgrading along the way of further educational work and professional task.

The grades “satisfactory” deserve a student who has got found the ability regarding the basic educational product to the degree required for further training and future work in an occupation, with the capacity of performing the tasks provided for by the system, knowledgeable about the key literary works suggested by this program. As a guideline, this assessment is presented to pupils who’ve made flaws in the reply to the exam plus in the performance for the exam assignments, but have actually demonstrated the capacity to expel them.

The assessment is “unsatisfactory” when it comes to student that has understanding of gaps which includes resulted infundamental errors within the implementation of the tasks given to because of the system, this is certainly, students that is struggling to carry on training or start expert tasks after graduation without additional trained in the relevant discipline.

Shortcomings of four-point evaluation rating and system system

A system that is four-way evaluating pupils’ knowledge, abilities and abilities calls for significant enhancement or replacement. Its main disadvantages are: inadequate motivation when it comes to determination of educational and cognitive task, given that it centers on obtaining at the least knowledge (“made up” – “did perhaps not make up”); created for the reproduction of knowledge and thinking (in sessional conditions, quickly accumulated information quickly “weathered”); subjectivity when you look at the evaluation of pupil’s knowledge; inconsistency with the college system, which students used as former pupils, etc.

The rating system of evaluation, which is based on the accumulation of grades for a certain period of study (module, semester, year, whole term of training) for a comprehensive educational and cognitive activity, is becoming increasingly popular along with the four-point traditional system of evaluation of students’ knowledge. The sum of the these assessments functions as an indicator that is quantitative of quality of academic and intellectual activity associated with student when compared with the successes of his other students.

The score system for assessing students’ knowledge, abilities and abilities is dependent on the principles that are following

  • each academic discipline and the pupil’s focus on its mastering is examined into the credit devices, the quantity of that is dependant on the score;
  • the record associated with student’s present work should be held, which can be mirrored within the final assessment (in the units of credits);
  • the peculiarities of teaching various subjects (complexity, importance of control when you look at the curriculum) are taken into consideration, that is, the complexity factor (importance);
  • accessibility to several types of control (outgoing, current, intermediate, last);

The student rating for the semester or year is understood to be the average arithmetic associated with rating for every single discipline.

To implement a rating system for assessing pupils’ knowledge, particular conditions are very important: the readiness of instructors and pupils to perceive them; proper organizational and support that is methodological in particular, separate work of pupils is obligatory; introduction of modular training; work accounting in the shapeof unique tables; application of written verification of real information, etc.

Comments are closed.

Switch to our mobile site